This project
commenced with a conceptual outline, published on Saturday 1st December,
2018, at: https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2018/12/humans-humanity-and-human-rights.html
I’ve decided I’ll
post each chapter in its first, raw state, and you, Dear Reader, can see if my
later research (probably long after I've finished this first version, in my retirement, should I be fortunate enough to actually get to retire) led to any change. (You
can also think about the points I am making.)
I've come up with an initial structure of the book (no guarantees it won't change), and will add the links to each
chapter in the latest installment as they are published. Owing to the
size of each chapter, I will have to publish this using the
sub-chapters. Links below, and also here.
- Foreword (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/03/humans-humanity-and-human-rights-intro.html)
- Chapter One – Introduction to Concepts and
Early Humans
A. Human Evolution and Human Rights (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/03/humans-humanity-and-human-rights-intro.html)I've started creating an audio version of the book, and the first interim video is on YouTube at https://youtu.be/zyd4LR_nudw.
B. The benefits of human rights (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/03/humans-humanity-and-human-rights-intro_8.html)
C. Words - definitions of human, human rights, and humanity(https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/03/humans-humanity-and-human-rights.html)
D. Potential Criticisms of the Idea that Decency and Fairness are Beneficial (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/03/humans-humanity-and-human-rights_24.html)
E. Our genetic neighbours, early (gatherer-hunter) humans, and being humane (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/04/humans-humanity-and-human-rights.html)
F. Population growth, and moving out of Africa (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/05/humans-humanity-and-human-rights.html)
G. What perspective does psychology and other modern thinking contribute? (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/06/humans-humanity-and-human-rights.html)
H. What perspective does modern human rights theory/understanding contribute? (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/07/humans-humanity-and-human-rights.html)
I. Summary / conclusions (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/07/humans-humanity-and-human-rights_29.html)
Chapter One: What I don't currently know to my satisfaction (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/07/this-projectcommenced-with-conceptual.html) - Chapter Two – Civilisation: The Domestication of Humans
- Chapter Three – Empire: The Concentration of Power Begins
- Chapter Four – Human Rights: The Concentration of Overarching Power Unravels
- Chapter Five – What Does the Future Hold in
Store?
Partial preview (https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/03/humans-humanity-and-human-rights-preview.html) - Chapter Six – The Soul: The Influence of Spirituality and/or Religion on Human Rights
- Chapter Seven – For the Pragmatist: Using / Applying All This “Stuff”
- Chapter Eight – Change: the Soul and the Bane of Humans, Humanity, and Human Rights
- Chapter Nine – My Last Trick: Ending . . .
*****
Well, there are
biological definitions, probably a whole swag of legal definitions in different
jurisdictions, a definition for each religion that is interested enough (I made the mistake of initially typing “cares
enough” . . . but compliance with dogma isn’t necessarily about
caring, in my opinion) about the topic to define their version of its meaning,
and philosophers have argued about aspects of this and related (and unrelated J )
matters for millennia.
What I
mean, in this context, is “the act of being humane” – of being kind.
I further define being humane as one of the key characteristics of
being human (and I note that such
characteristics are not necessarily limited to our species, but then I do also
include membership of the species homo sapiens as another key part of being
human).
For some contrast,
let’s look at a few dictionary definitions, which I have collated into the
table below. (Out of necessity, I have
précised each definition.)
Source
|
Human
|
Humane
|
Humanity
|
Human
Rights
|
Oxford English Dictionary [1]
|
Relating to or characteristic of humankind [2]
|
Having or showing compassion or benevolence.
formal (of a branch of learning)
intended to have a civilizing effect on people. [3]
|
Human beings collectively. The quality of being
humane; benevolence. [4]
|
A right which is believed to belong to every
person. [5]
|
Wiktionary [6]
|
Of or belonging to the species Homo sapiens or its closest relatives.
Having the nature or attributes of a human being. [7]
|
Variant form of human, now preserved in
specialized senses. [8]
|
Mankind; human beings as a group. The human
condition or nature. The quality of being benevolent; humane traits of
character; humane qualities or aspects. Any academic subject belonging to the
humanities. [9]
|
The basic rights and freedoms that all humans
should be guaranteed, such as the right to life and liberty, freedom of
thought and expression, and equality before the law. [10]
|
Dictionary . com [11]
|
Adjective: of, pertaining to, characteristic of,
or having the nature of people; consisting of people; of or relating to the
social aspect of people; sympathetic, humane.
Noun: a human being. [12]
|
Adj.: characterized by tenderness, compassion, and
sympathy for people and animals, especially for the suffering or distressed; acting
in a manner that causes the least harm to people or animals; of or relating
to humanistic studies. [13]
|
All human beings collectively; the human race;
humankind. The quality or condition of being human; human nature. The quality
of being humane; kindness; benevolence. The humanities. [14]
|
Fundamental rights, especially those believed to
belong to an individual and in whose exercise a government may not interfere,
as the rights to speak, associate, work, etc. [15]
|
Online Etymology Dictionary [16]
|
Adjective: mid-15th C., humain, humaigne, “human,” from Old French humain, umain (adj.)
“of or belonging to man” (12th C.), from Latin humanus “of man, human,” also “humane,
philanthropic, kind, gentle, polite”;
Noun: “a human being,” 1530s, from human (adj.).
Its Old English equivalent, guma,
survives only in disguise in bridegroom. [17]
|
Mid-15th C., a parallel variant of
human (adj.), with a form and stress that perhaps suggest a stronger
association with Latin humanus than
with Old French humain. [18]
|
Late 14th C., “kindness, graciousness,
politeness; consideration for others,” from Old French humanité, umanité “human
nature; humankind, life on earth; pity,” from Latin humanitatem. [19]
|
Human rights attested by 1680s. [20]
|
So, looking at these various definitions, it
would seem to be that the definitional orthodoxy is:
·
“human” means a member of the species homo sapiens, a human being, or pertaining
to, characteristic of, or having the nature of people; consisting of people; of
or relating to the social aspect of people – with a (French) derivation that includes reference to humane;
·
“humane” means compassion or sympathy, with
references to humanistic studies and a “civilising” effect, with a Latin
derivation that includes “humane, philanthropic, kind, gentle, polite”;
·
“humanity” means a collective reference, or
benevolence or “kindness, graciousness, politeness; consideration for others”;
and
·
“human rights” refers to basic or fundamental
rights “believed to belong to every person”.
I rest my case – for
the moment - that kindness is an essential part of being human – there are
others, of course, and kindness is not limited to homo sapiens, as anyone who has ever bonded with a pet would know.
In fact, I have also
read accounts of humans being saved by animals (e.g., dolphins), and there may well be other accounts of kindness
shown by other animals as well. In general, that kindness does not extend to
prey, but I recall a predator appearing
to befriend a young gazelle for a few days before other predators in the pack
killed the unfortunate and terrified young animal.
Kindness towards prey
seems to be something shown by humans, with such things as modern requirements
for “humane” (i.e., not distressing to
the animal) methods of slaughtering – although that doesn’t get extended to
plants, and there is contested evidence that plants are capable of feeling (Fruitarianism, anyone?).
So . . ., to summarise my
argument:
·
kindness is not unique to humans;
·
the extent to which humans use kindness may be
unique;
·
kindness is a key, but neither exclusive nor
sole, characteristic of being human; and
·
the absence of kindness may be indicative of
damage to a human.
I’ve just introduced
that last point, and will return to it elsewhere in this book, but for now, consider
the stunned “how could they do it?” response that greets major atrocities (such as the My Lae massacre [21]
, the Holocaust [22]
or the human rights abuses in the USSR, mostly under Stalin [23]
- and other despots have also committed such crimes [24]
), crimes (such as sadistic crime
sprees, or cannibalistic crimes, or child abuse), or other abuses [25]
. The absence of kindness is one part of what allows people to commit terrible
acts, acts that question the very humanness of the perpetrator.
Kindness will also
crop up when I consider the closely-related-to-human-rights matter of human
dignity.
[3]
URL https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/humane
(I didn’t expect that second definition)
(I didn’t expect that second definition)
[4]
URL https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/humanity
(note: this is from the head page of the search on that website. If you go there, there are links to more comprehensive etymological histories)
(note: this is from the head page of the search on that website. If you go there, there are links to more comprehensive etymological histories)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.