Note: CONTENT WARNING - some of this content is about upsetting, disturbing or triggering events & attitudes. Seek competent help - including professional - if you need it. For anyone distressed by anything in this post, or for any other reason considering seeking support, resources are available in Australia here, here, and here. In other nations, you will have to do an Internet search using terms such as “mental health support - <your nation>” (which, for instance, may lead to this, this, and this, in the USA, or this, this, and this, in France [biased towards English-language - my apologies]), or perhaps try https://www.befrienders.org/.
The concept of corporations is not necessarily inherently bad ...
However, the reality of corporations in the late 20th and so far in the 21st century does include substantial problems and concerns - such as concerns about inequity, workplace conditions (especially where workforces are in developing nations - and I have written a fair bit about workplace issues on this blog * ), health (e.g., the tobacco industry) and safety (e.g., the car industry until second half of the 20th century), possible economic impacts - especially if they become too large (e.g., Enron, Lehman Brothers, and Standard Oil), environmental impacts (including things like air travel, but also how mining operations are conducted, and this), and resistance to action to address the climate crisis - certainly in the case of the fossil fuel industry.
There are perceptions that corporations can stifle individuals (e.g., SLAPP) or endanger sovereignty (e.g., ISDS).
On the other hand, corporations are often ahead of government in terms of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), many are trying to do better through corporate social responsibility programmes and things like B-Corp registration, and incorporation provides benefits for clubs and associations.
Also, the concept of legal personhood for corporations (and this is an interesting possible extension) is now being applied to protect places such as rivers.
In addition, in our capitalistic world (and whether the world should be capitalist is, in my opinion, up for debate - but it won’t change in the new few years at least, so I am comfortable writing and posting this article for now ...), it provides a means for companies to access funds so they can “do more” ... which is potentially subject to the concerns - and benefits - outlined above.
But a lot of these issues are relatively recent - not all, especially with regard to the empires that were built for the sake of the profit of various East India companies (the British, French, and Dutch come to mind quite easily - and I am currently reading “Revolusi: Indonesia and the Birth of the Modern World” by David Van Reybrouck [pub. Vintage Digital, 8 February 2024, ISBN 978-1-529-92091-8, Amazon] about the latter) and their very small numbers of shareholders.
There is an assumption - mostly amongst politico-socio-economic elites and their sock puppet economists - that economic activity will have a benefit for society (basically through a trickle down effect, although that is rarely admitted - and the puppet economists may not be aware that such is what they are basing their opinions on).
The problem, as I wrote here, is that the assumption is not checked, or there is only a glib, superficial, for-the-form-of-it check.
Ideological blindness is a problem.
That concern also applies to the other side.
It is possible for structures such as corporatisation/incorporation to aid small and/or ethical (including socially and environmentally) organisations as well.
Again, the issue is ensuring that assumptions are checked ... and re-checked as circumstances change.
And make sure that checking is not subverted by the rich and wealthy into a way of not taking necessary action ...
That includes making sure paid employment remains decent, rather than dragging employees down to a struggle to survive ... as I wrote about here.
Here are a few additional links for your consideration:
- Encyclopaedia Britannica “corporation” https://www.britannica.com/money/corporation
- Investopaedia “Corporation: What It Is and How to Form One” https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporation.asp
- Corporate Finance Institute “Corporation” https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/accounting/what-is-corporation-overview/
- Lawpath “A Guide to the Corporations Act 2001: Key Regulations for Australian Companies” https://lawpath.com.au/blog/guide-corporations-act-2001
- Wikipedia “Corporation” https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corporation&oldid=1200869425
Also:
- “How a US mining firm sued Mexico for billions – for trying to protect its own seabed | Oceans | The Guardian” https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/31/how-a-us-mining-firm-sued-mexico-for-billions-for-trying-to-protect-its-own-seabed Another “investor–state dispute settlement” problem - see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Investor%E2%80%93state_dispute_settlement&oldid=1194250369#Debates_and_criticism
- “Australian-linked mining companies helping to prop up Myanmar military junta, report alleges” https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/jan/29/australian-linked-mining-companies-myanmar-military-help-report-allegation ““Australia
needs to act now to impose sanctions on the junta, its businesses and
[its] cronies and stop Australians from directly and indirectly
providing funds and other forms of support to the junta,” Muang said in
relation to the allegations”
- “For corporations, greed is good – so how can Australia really tackle price gouging?” https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/commentisfree/2024/feb/08/for-corporations-greed-is-good-so-how-can-australia-really-tackle-price-gouging
- “Milton Friedman Was Wrong” https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/milton-friedman-shareholder-wrong/596545/ “The famed economist’s “shareholder theory” provides corporations with too much room to violate consumers’ rights and trust”
- “The struggle for the soul of the B Corp movement” https://www.ft.com/content/0b632709-afda-4bdc-a6f3-bb0b02eb5a62 “The ESG initiative pledges to turn companies into forces for good, but some are wary of its growing focus on multinational corporations”
- “The New Corporation: How “Good” Corporations are Bad for Democracy” https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/09/09/the-new-corporation-how-good-corporations-are-bad-for-democracy/
- “If Corporations Are People, They Should Act Like It” https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/02/if-corporations-are-people-they-should-act-like-it/385034/ “Companies deserve many of the same rights as citizens, but must also shoulder the same responsibilities”
- “Corporate Political Spending Is Bad Business” https://hbr.org/2022/01/corporate-political-spending-is-bad-business
- “Holding corporations to account” https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/holding-corporations-to-account “The slippery concept of corporate guilt too often allows companies off the hook. The law needs reforming”
- “Stakeholder Governance—Issues and Answers” https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/10/25/stakeholder-governance-issues-and-answers/
- Wikipedia “Criticisms of corporations” https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criticisms_of_corporations&oldid=1199689320
- “How White Privilege Disproves The Lie About a Merit-Based Society” https://allyfromnola.medium.com/how-white-privilege-disproves-the-lie-about-a-merit-based-society-cda71b932703 “In a merit-based society, white privilege wouldn't exist”
- “How The Tuskegee Experiments Still Impact Trust For Medical Industry” https://medium.com/afrosapiophile/how-the-tuskegee-experiments-still-impact-trust-for-medical-industry-a933f4059216
- “Millions of Australians have a chronic illness. So why aren’t employers accommodating them?” https://theconversation.com/millions-of-australians-have-a-chronic-illness-so-why-arent-employers-accommodating-them-219612 “... the continued exposure to work stressors can lead to or exacerbate chronic health conditions ... Our research found 73% of people believed their chronic illness was at least partially caused or worsened by their job. Almost one in five people believed work entirely caused or worsened their illness. These findings accord with data from Safe Work Australia”
- “Right to disconnect from work laws set to pass Australian parliament after deals with crossbench” https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/feb/07/australia-right-to-switch-off-laws-industrial-relations-changes-labor-greens “Smartphones mean we’re always available to our bosses. ‘Right to disconnect’ laws are a necessary fix” https://theconversation.com/smartphones-mean-were-always-available-to-our-bosses-right-to-disconnect-laws-are-a-necessary-fix-222738
- “Why the mental cost of a STEM career can be too high for women and people of colour” https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00324-0
- “The Borking of America | Robert Reich” https://youtu.be/YMZKegjJurk?si=nwRD38mFgQb9HS02
... and:
- “On forgetting that money is a token of exchange ... ” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2023/12/on-forgetting-that-money-is-token-of.html
- “More on utilisation rates ... and productivity / undermining progressive measures” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2024/01/more-on-utilisation-rates-and.html
- “Risk Management: Motivation” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2020/12/risk-management-motivation.html
- “Ethics, Lazy Management, and Flawed Thinking” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2019/11/ethics-lazy-management-and-flawed.html
- “From an old website of mine” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2018/06/from-old-website-of-mine.html
- “Adapting to the Future of Work: our Third Most Imperative Need” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2017/03/adapting-to-future-of-work-our-third.html
- “A major change: the introduction of a “positive duty” to prevent sexual harassment” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2024/01/a-major-change-introduction-of-positive.html and “An activism email on the introduction of a “positive duty” to prevent sexual harassment [Note: Content Warning - discusses discrimination and effects, including self harm. Reader discretion is advised]” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2024/02/an-activism-email-on-introduction-of.html
- “The NEED to keep ("unconscious") bigotry OUT of governance” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-need-to-keep-unconscious-bigots-out.html
- “The problem of going into management without having started at the groundfloor ... ” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-problem-of-going-into-management.html
- “A test for stress management techniques” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2023/12/a-test-for-stress-management-techniques.html
- “The problems of not being a “team player” [Note: Content Warning - discusses prejudice and abuse, and links to videos discussing self harm and suicide. Reader discretion is advised]” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2023/12/the-problems-of-not-being-team-player.html
- “Changing the world” https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2023/12/changing-world.html
... and also:
- https://gnwmythrsglossary.blogspot.com/2023/06/patriarchy.html
- https://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/2023/08/post-no-2535-trauma-content-warning.html
* I’ll also add brief mention of a new one: workplace feedback for senior staff. When I reached more senior levels, there was quite a bit that I was doing which was good - mentoring, making technical, market & other recommendations, etc. However, in reviews that was too often reduced to “meets expectations” - which, while true in terms of expectations, was very demotivating and psychologically damaging. Or were we expected to just ... somehow internally “know” that we were doing excellent work, and that was supposed to be ... enough? Was this a stereotypical male thing? That same criticism was one I made of internal and industry awards: in many cases, it was doing the everyday consistently well that was of far greater benefit to the world than the flashy, glitzy, gizmo-laden latest.
Assumptions / basis
In writing this, I have assumed / started from the following:
- this blog states quite clearly that it is about political and human rights matters, including lived experience of problems, and thus I will assume readers are reasonable people who have noted the content warning in the post header;
Possible flaws
Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider:
- there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan
Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;
- I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
If they are of any use of interest, the activism information links from my former news posts are available in this post.
If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below.
Copyright © Kayleen White 2016-2024 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product. Otherwise,
fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.