Note: CONTENT WARNING - some of this content is about upsetting, disturbing or triggering events & attitudes. Seek competent help - including professional - if you need it. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that linked
articles may contains names and/or images of deceased people. READER CAUTION IS RECOMMENDED! For
anyone distressed by anything in this post, or for any other reason considering
seeking support, resources are available in Australia here, here, and here. In other nations, you will have to do an Internet search using terms such as “mental health support - <your nation>” (which, for instance, may lead to this, this, and this, in the USA, or this, this, and this, in France [biased towards English-language - my apologies]), or perhaps try https://www.befrienders.org/.
Note: in my “from the news” posts, quotes are shown italicised and blue, my comments are in a different shade of blue, and “good” items are shown in green. I have loosely grouped the posts where such seemed reasonable, but that is subjective (i.e., my opinion - others are free to disagree), and challenging, as some posts belong in multiple “groups”.
Frrom this week’s news on society generally, and broader issues (note: I may continue to add links for a few days, possibly up to a week, after these are published):
- “How White Privilege Disproves The Lie About a Merit-Based Society” https://allyfromnola.medium.com/how-white-privilege-disproves-the-lie-about-a-merit-based-society-cda71b932703 “In a merit-based society, white privilege wouldn't exist”
- “How The Tuskegee Experiments Still Impact Trust For Medical Industry” https://medium.com/afrosapiophile/how-the-tuskegee-experiments-still-impact-trust-for-medical-industry-a933f4059216
- “Sesame Street‘s Elmo sparks social media frenzy with simple check-in” https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/life/health/2024/01/31/elmo-mental-health-check “The innocent check-in unleashed a deluge of responses. The post had been viewed more than 140 million times by late Tuesday, and there were a whopping 83,000-plus likes. Many of the responses express unhappiness at the state of the world.” Wow - but quite credible, IMO
- “Freedom of information laws are key to exposing AI wrongdoing. The current system isn’t up to the task” https://theconversation.com/freedom-of-information-laws-are-key-to-exposing-ai-wrongdoing-the-current-system-isnt-up-to-the-task-221404 “In the AI science boom, beware: your results are only as good as your data” https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00306-2 “Machine-learning
systems are voracious data consumers — but trustworthy results require
more vetting both before and after publication” The problem is data sets being used multiple times as if they were independent, not copies
Assumptions / basis
In writing this, I have assumed / started from the following:
- this blog states quite clearly that it is about political and human rights matters, including lived experience of problems, and thus I will assume readers are reasonable people who have noted the content warning in the post header;
Possible flaws
Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider:
- there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan
Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;
- I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
If they are of any use of interest, the activism information links from my former news posts are available in this post.
If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below.
Copyright © Kayleen White 2016-2024 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product. Otherwise,
fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.