Note: in my “from the news” posts, quotes are shown italicised and blue, my comments are in a different shade of blue, and “good” items are shown in green. I have loosely grouped the posts where such seemed reasonable, but that is subjective (i.e., my opinion - others are free to disagree), and challenging, as some posts belong in multiple “groups”.
Frrom this week’s news on society generally, and broader issues (note: I may continue to add links for a few days, possibly up to a week, after these are published):
- “For 30 years I saw my kidnapping as character-building – until I finally faced what happened to me” https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/apr/10/for-30-years-i-saw-my-kidnapping-as-character-building-until-i-finally-faced-what-happened-to-me “As a gen X feminist who survived and ignored a violent assault in the 80s, I didn’t identify as a victim – but #MeToo gave me a crucial new perspective”
- “The Dutch are aiming to quarantine populism. Should the rest of the world follow suit?” https://theconversation.com/the-dutch-are-aiming-to-quarantine-populism-should-the-rest-of-the-world-follow-suit-227432 “The
legitimacy of liberalism hangs in the balance. Whether quarantining
populism via coalitions formed by weakened parties will barricade the
door against populists is an open question. Many populists, after all,
are highly organized, well-funded by the billionaire class and skilled
at sowing disorder. It’s going to take much more than a legislative lock
on the door to shore up our defences. But it’s incumbent upon the
courageous Dutch and others to give it a shot.” This
warning has been made in a wide range of forums and formats: it seems
someone is having a genuine go at dealing with the problem, although
they may be underestimating it
- “Massive investment and financial reform needed to rescue SDGs” https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/04/1148411
- “The French aristocrat who understood evolution 100 years before Darwin – and even worried about climate change” https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/apr/07/the-french-aristocrat-who-understood-evolution-100-years-before-darwin-and-even-worried-about-climate-change “Georges-Louis
Leclerc proposed species change and extinction back in the 1740s, a new
book reveals ... Buffon postulated that new species must have come
into existence and changed over time, while some species must have gone
extinct. “That was a very, very radical idea at the time, and Buffon was
censured for it by the Sorbonne: he had to write a statement publicly
renouncing everything he had written,” said Roberts. Buffon was later
formally accused of heresy for implying that Earth was older than the
biblical record. ... Since Buffon had to keep undermining his own
observations, it was easy for Victorian naturalists to brush aside his
contributions”
Assumptions / basis
In writing this, I have assumed / started from the following:
- this blog states quite clearly that it is about political and human rights matters, including lived experience of problems, and thus I will assume readers are reasonable people who have noted the content warning in the post header;
Possible flaws
Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider:
- there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan
Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;
- I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
If they are of any use of interest, the activism information links from my former news posts are available in this post.
If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below.
Copyright © Kayleen White 2016-2024 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product. Otherwise,
fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.