This was sent last night:
- 94.55% of all participants (2930) indicated that they had seen online anti-trans abuse, harassment or vilification in the last year.
- 49.20% (644) of trans participants had experienced online anti-trans abuse, harassment or vilification in the last 12 months.47.90% of trans participants reported experiencing in-person anti-trans abuse, harassment or vilification in the last 12 months.
- 34.22% of trans participants said they had experienced more or significantly more in-person anti-trans hate compared to 2020.
- 40.03% of trans participants experienced more or significantly more online anti-trans hate compared to 2020.
- 23.61% of trans participants reported more or significantly more anti-trans in-person hate in the two months leading up to the survey compared to the start of the year.
- 31.17% of trans participants experienced more or significantly more online anti-trans hate in the two months preceding the survey compared to the start of the year.
- 15.97% of trans participants had experienced anti-trans violence in the last 12 months.
I considered sending an email about the attempt to resurrect the old exclude all biwomen and transwomen who are lesbians from an event intended to cater for cisgender lesbians in a public space, but didn't have the energy.
The key points I was going to make if I had, however, were as follows:
- it is important that everyone be psychologically safe;
- however, there may be a need to consider apparently conflicting rights - about which Kant _
- the basis of the request for an exemption is an aspect of questionable relevance, and verges on being defamatory;
- sexual assault is caused by issues such as patriarchy, power, and character. The requested exemption is akin to associating gun violence with people of a particular hair colour;
- furthermore, women do and have committed sexual assault - including lesbians;
- the view that excluding trans women will mean cislesbians feel safe is false;
- furthermore, the implication that trans women not women is false and unsupportable
- the implication that the lesbian community built around cisgender women is false - there are some notable inclusive groups;
- there are also concerns about how this would be policed - after all, one transwoman passed well enough to be a so-called “Bond girl”.
- the aspirations of this request have been built on shifting sands, possibly out of fear at having to grieve the loss of false notions about reality (specifically, the nature of gender) and then adjust their life;
- https://www.starobserver.com.
au/news/national-news/ victoria-news/melbourne-group- applies-for-exemption-to-hold- lesbians-born-female-only- event/225778 https://humanrights.gov.au/ our-work/legal/exemption- applications-under-sex- discrimination-act-1984-cth - https://humanrights.gov.au/
sites/default/files/lesbian_ action_group_application_for_ a_temporary_exemption_ redacted_0.pdf - https://humanrights.gov.au/
sites/default/files/lesbian_ action_group_additions_to_ application_for_exemption_ redacted_0.pdf - https://aifs.gov.au/resources/
practice-guides/intimate- partner-violence-lesbian-gay- bisexual-trans-intersex-and- queer - http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-
bin/viewdoc/au/cases/tas/ TASCAT/2022/142.html - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Gender_essentialism - https://www.lemkininstitute.
com/statements-new-page/ statement-on-the-genocidal- nature-of-the-gender-critical- movement%E2%80%99s-ideology- and-practice - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
False_equivalence
If they are of any use of interest, the activism information links from my former news posts are available in this post.
If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below.
Vote Yes for the Voice in Australia.
Finally, remember: we need to be more human being rather than human doing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.